The United Democratic Alliance (UDA) has responded to criticism from the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) regarding its appointment of public figures to key positions within the party, labeling ODM’s objections as baseless and diversionary.
In a recent statement, ODM raised concerns about UDA’s decision to appoint KRA boss Anthony Mwaura and KPLC Chairperson Joy Midivo to lead crucial committees, citing potential violations of the Ethics and Integrity Act.
UDA Secretary General Cleophas Malala swiftly countered these claims, asserting that Mwaura and Midivo did not qualify as public officers according to constitutional definitions.
Malala clarified that chairpersons of state corporations, including Mwaura and Midivo, were not categorized as public officers under Article 260 of the Constitution.
Furthermore, Malala accused ODM of hypocrisy, pointing out the alleged absence of democratic practices within the party, particularly the delayed implementation of grassroots elections.
He suggested that ODM’s sudden interest in UDA’s internal affairs was an attempt to deflect attention from its own internal struggles, notably surrounding the nomination of Raila Odinga for the African Union Commission Chair position.
Malala concluded by condemning ODM’s actions as politically motivated, aiming to detract from substantive issues within their own ranks.
